Complaints submission
If you have concerns about the conduct or competence of an ASTTBC registrant, you are encouraged to submit a complaint to ASTTBC.
Authority and jurisdiction
ASTTBC is a regulatory body under the Professional Governance Act (PGA) and the International Credentials Recognition Act (ICRA) and is committed to protecting British Columbians and the environment by regulating Applied Science Technologists (AScTs), Certified Technicians (CTechs), and Registered Technical Specialists, such as Registered Fire Protection Technicians (RFPTs), and Registered Onsite Wastewater Practitioners (ROWPs).
ASTTBC can only investigate complaints that fall within its statutory mandate. This includes allegations that a registrant engaged in professional misconduct (including breaches of the PGA and ASTTBC Bylaws), incompetent practice, or conduct unbecoming.
ASTTBC has jurisdiction over former registrants only in relation to conduct that is alleged to have occurred while they were registered with ASTTBC.
You can verify whether an individual is registered with ASTTBC by searching the public register. If you are unable to find the individual or need assistance confirming their registration status, please contact us at info@asttbc.org.
ASTTBC does not have jurisdiction over firms or companies.
Please read the information below before submitting a complaint: To submit a complaint, please complete the complaint form.
Things to know before submitting a complaint:
-
What ASTTBC cannot investigate
ASTTBC cannot investigate or resolve concerns that fall outside of its jurisdiction.
ASTTBC is unable to:
- Compensate anyone (monetary or non-monetary). Those seeking compensation should speak with a lawyer
- Resolve contractual disputes
- Resolve issues or disputes with registrants on a complainant’s behalf
- Demand action by a registrant
- Investigate the involvement of unregulated individuals
- Provide legal advice or legal assistance
- Mediate or address employment disputes
-
Can I make an anonymous complaint?
No, ASTTBC cannot accept anonymous complaints.
It is difficult and sometimes impossible to investigate your concerns if ASTTBC does not have your name or contact details to clarify and/or seek further information. Additionally:
- without using your name, ASTTBC may not be able to gather the necessary information about your concerns, and
- ASTTBC needs to ensure those involved in the complaint and investigation are given a fair opportunity to respond to concerns. It may be difficult to explain the concerns without disclosing your identity.
A copy of your complaint, along with any evidence gathered during the investigation, will be provided to the registrant who is the subject of the complaint. Information you provide may also be shared with other witnesses when necessary for the investigation.
ASTTBC and the Investigation Committee will keep information gathered during an investigation confidential, except where disclosure is necessary for the investigation or required in accordance with the ASTTBC Discipline and Title Misuse Publication Policy.
-
How long does an investigation take?
Conducting a fair and thorough investigation takes time. ASTTBC strives to complete investigations as efficiently as possible, but some cases take longer than others. Factors that can affect the duration of an investigation include:
- Cooperation of the parties involved
- Delays in obtaining evidence
- Complexity of the issues under investigation
- Seriousness of the matters being investigated
ASTTBC staff keep both complainants and registrants informed about the status of an investigation as new information becomes available. Once a disposition decision is made, both the complainant and registrant are advised of the outcome.
Complainants are also notified if the Investigation Committee directs the registrar to issue a citation for a discipline hearing or issues a temporary order that suspends or limits a registrant’s practice while the investigation is ongoing.
-
Complaints & investigation process
The PGA and the ASTTBC Bylaws set out the process by which ASTTBC investigates and resolves complaints. Investigations are led by the Investigation Committee. If a complaint proceeds to a discipline hearing, the resolutions are determined by the Discipline Committee.
1. Complaint submission
After receiving a complaint, ASTTBC staff will review the complaint and correspond with the complainant as needed to gather sufficient information to indicate a concern within ASTTBC’s jurisdiction.
If there is a valid concern within ASTTBC’s jurisdiction, a complaint file is opened.
At this stage, staff may gather additional information from the registrant and other witnesses, where appropriate. Typically, the registrant will be notified of the complaint, provided with a copy of the complaint materials, and asked to respond. Staff will assess the potential risk to the public and the environment and determine the file’s priority level accordingly. The risk assessment and file priority may be updated as additional information is obtained during the investigation.
Extraordinary action
Where a complaint or evidence gathered during an investigation indicates a potential risk of serious harm to the public or the environment, ASTTBC may take extraordinary action under section 67 of the PGA. Such action may include imposing limits or conditions on a registrant’s practice, or suspending the registrant without prior notice or an opportunity to be heard, in order to protect the public interest.2. Investigation
Only the Investigation Committee has the authority to authorize an investigation. Once authorized, the Investigation Committee may appoint an investigator. An appointed investigator may interview the complainant, the registrant, and other witnesses with relevant information; gather documents and other evidence; and obtain input from subject matter experts. The investigation will include all steps necessary to obtain the information required for the Investigation Committee’s review.
3. Disposition/resolution
After the investigation is complete, the Investigation Committee reviews the investigation materials and determines the appropriate disposition to resolve the complaint.
Pursuant to section 70 of the ASTTBC Bylaws, the Investigation Committee may resolve a complaint in one or more of the following ways:
- File closed with no further action
A complaint may be closed with no further action if the registrant’s conduct or competence is satisfactory, or the matter is trivial, frivolous, vexatious or made in bad faith. - Refer the registrant for a practice review
The Investigation Committee may refer the registrant to undergo a practice review where minor professional practice issues are noted. - Issue a letter of caution
If minor issues are identified that the registrant can improve upon, the Investigation Committee may close the file by issuing a letter of caution and providing recommendations to the registrant. - Resolution without a discipline hearing
The Investigation Committee may propose a reprimand and remedial action by consent (RRAC), or a consent order, where the registrant agrees to certain penalties instead of proceeding to a citation and discipline hearing.
Penalties may include, but are not limited to, accepting a reprimand, completing education and/or examinations, undergoing counselling, writing a reflective letter, supervised practice, paying a disciplinary penalty and reimbursing ASTTBC for investigative costs.
If a RRAC or consent order is agreed to by the registrant, it will be published on the ASTTBC website in accordance with the ASTTBC Discipline and Title Misuse Publication Policy.
- Issue a citation
A citation authorizes a discipline hearing and outlines the allegations against a registrant. Citations are published on the ASTTBC website in accordance with the ASTTBC Discipline and Title Misuse Publication Policy.
A discipline hearing is a public, formal adjudicative process before a panel of the Discipline Committee. During the hearing, witnesses with relevant information regarding the allegations provide testimony, and evidence is presented. As a complainant, you may be required to testify about the matters raised in your complaint.
- File closed with no further action
Discipline resolutions
As a regulatory body under the Professional Governance Act (PGA) and the International Credentials Recognition Act (ICRA), ASTTBC addresses incompetent practice, professional misconduct, conduct unbecoming a registrant, and breaches of the PGA or ASTTBC Bylaws in accordance with Part 6 of the PGA and Part VIII of the ASTTBC Bylaws.
-
Citations for Disciplinary Hearing
Registrant name Issue date Hearing date -
Disciplinary Outcomes 2026
Effective date Registrant name Status Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent Jul 20, 2026 Charanjit Singh Ghuman Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent Jul 7, 2026 Asim Omar Faruque Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent Jan 28, 2026 Samina Fitz-Gerald Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent Jan 5, 2026 Guang Xuan Deng -
2025
Effective date Registrant name Status Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent Dec 14, 2025 Laura Gray Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent Nov 23, 2025 John Edward Robson Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent Nov 04, 2025 John Rowse Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent Nov 03, 2025 Jong Hak Baek Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent Oct 14, 2025 Gregory Smith Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent Jul 30, 2025 David Benoit Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent Jul 21, 2025 Randolph Hogg Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent Jan 15, 2025 Kenneth Reed Conrad -
2024
Effective date Registrant name Status Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent Dec 19, 2024 Timothy Cisaroski Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent Sept 13, 2024 Stanley Feng Su Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent June 22, 2024 Kaljinder Pohar Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent June 7, 2024 Joe da Costa Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent June 6, 2024 Douglas Hunter Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent June 1, 2024 Richard Lyall Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent May 2, 2024 Shane Karan Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent April 18, 2024 Christopher Mahadeo Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent March 26, 2024 Wei Chen Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent March 8, 2024 Desmond Perera Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent February 21, 2024 Mark Autio Consent Order February 20, 2024 Michael Joseph Ferg -
2023
Effective date Registrant name Status Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent December 18, 2023 Gordon Knight Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent December 11, 2023 Kirby Mow Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent December 4, 2023 Juxin Wang Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent March 22, 2023 Hsin-Chang Lin Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent January 18, 2023 Lord Al-Shayea Reprimand or Remedial Action by Consent January 4, 2023 John Rinaldi